Login to
view or update your response to this question.
Survey Results
Justification: coherentism, nonreliabilist foundationalism, reliabilism, or infinitism?
950 respondents
Accept or lean towards:
coherentism
coherentism
23.68% (19.16%)
Reject or lean against:
coherentism
coherentism
1.16% (0.00%)
Accept or lean towards:
infinitism
infinitism
2.00% (1.47%)
Reject or lean against:
infinitism
infinitism
4.11% (0.00%)
Accept or lean towards:
nonreliabilist foundationalism
nonreliabilist foundationalism
25.16% (21.79%)
Reject or lean against:
nonreliabilist foundationalism
nonreliabilist foundationalism
2.42% (0.00%)
Accept or lean towards:
reliabilism
reliabilism
33.58% (28.84%)
Reject or lean against:
reliabilism
reliabilism
1.47% (0.00%)
Accept a combination of views
6.95%
Accept an alternative view
5.05%
The question is too unclear to answer
3.05%
There is no fact of the matter
2.00%
Agnostic/undecided
10.53%
Other
1.16%
Most popular option combinations
Options | Number of responses | % of responses |
---|---|---|
| 21 | 2.21% |
| 10 | 1.05% |
| 10 | 1.05% |
| 8 | 0.84% |
| 2 | 0.21% |
Alternative Views
67 target respondents indicated that they accept or lean toward an alternative view. The words used in their responses cluster as follows. These results are not filtered by AOS, region, etc.
- PROP (7): proper (6) proper-functionalism (1)
- CONT (7): contextualism (5) contextualist (1) contextually (1)
- FUNC (6): functionalism (5) function (1)
- EPIS (5): epistemic (3) epistemology (2)
- PLUR (4): pluralism (4)
- EVID (3): evidence (2) evidentialism (1)
- INTE (3): internalist (2) interesting (1)
- FORM (3): form (1) forming (1) forms (1)
- HAAC (3): haack (3)
- VIRT (3): virtue (2) virtues (1)
- PRAG (3): pragmatism (2) pragmatist (1)
- DIFF (3): different (3)
- DEFA (3): default-challenge (1) default (1) default-and-challenge-model (1)
- EXTE (3): externalist (2) externalism (1)
Longitudinal comparison to 2009 survey
Strongest correlations with main questions (target population)
r: -0.44
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 57 | 238 |
Reject | 271 | 199 |
n: 765
p < 0.0001
r: 0.42
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 158 | 60 |
Reject | 169 | 376 |
n: 763
p < 0.0001
r: 0.32
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 108 | 95 |
Reject | 100 | 361 |
n: 664
p < 0.0001
r: 0.32
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 60 | 127 |
Reject | 37 | 389 |
n: 613
p < 0.0001
r: -0.31
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 92 | 58 |
Reject | 376 | 76 |
n: 602
p < 0.0001
r: -0.31
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 30 | 77 |
Reject | 192 | 155 |
n: 454
p < 0.0001
r: 0.3
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 38 | 112 |
Reject | 35 | 417 |
n: 602
p < 0.0001
r: 0.28
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 25 | 81 |
Reject | 29 | 316 |
n: 451
p < 0.0001
r: 0.28
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 82 | 153 |
Reject | 56 | 318 |
n: 609
p < 0.0001
r: 0.28
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 87 | 105 |
Reject | 86 | 356 |
n: 634
p < 0.0001
r: -0.28
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 68 | 116 |
Reject | 317 | 192 |
n: 693
p < 0.0001
r: -0.27
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 69 | 129 |
Reject | 299 | 176 |
n: 673
p < 0.0001
r: 0.27
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 62 | 109 |
Reject | 62 | 336 |
n: 569
p < 0.0001
r: 0.26
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 50 | 67 |
Reject | 71 | 308 |
n: 496
p < 0.0001
r: 0.26
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 145 | 69 |
Reject | 198 | 321 |
n: 733
p < 0.0001
r: 0.25
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 167 | 55 |
Reject | 293 | 277 |
n: 792
p < 0.0001
r: 0.25
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 61 | 111 |
Reject | 78 | 417 |
n: 667
p < 0.0001
r: 0.25
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 54 | 104 |
Reject | 83 | 376 |
n: 617
p < 0.0001
r: -0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 53 | 136 |
Reject | 289 | 256 |
n: 734
p < 0.0001
r: -0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 84 | 142 |
Reject | 335 | 205 |
n: 766
p < 0.0001
r: -0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 139 | 62 |
Reject | 486 | 85 |
n: 772
p < 0.0001
r: 0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 95 | 93 |
Reject | 83 | 189 |
n: 460
p < 0.0001
r: 0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 190 | 36 |
Reject | 359 | 207 |
n: 792
p < 0.0001
r: 0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 73 | 72 |
Reject | 90 | 227 |
n: 462
p < 0.0001
r: 0.24
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 82 | 147 |
Reject | 89 | 479 |
n: 797
p < 0.0001
r: 0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 110 | 97 |
Reject | 128 | 374 |
n: 709
p < 0.0001
r: 0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 98 | 53 |
Reject | 123 | 180 |
n: 454
p < 0.0001
r: -0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 56 | 214 |
Reject | 155 | 273 |
n: 698
p < 0.0001
r: -0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 10 | 176 |
Reject | 45 | 228 |
n: 459
p < 0.0001
r: 0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 59 | 30 |
Reject | 130 | 182 |
n: 401
p < 0.0001
r: 0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 201 | 97 |
Reject | 222 | 248 |
n: 768
p < 0.0001
r: -0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 105 | 125 |
Reject | 390 | 178 |
n: 798
p < 0.0001
r: 0.23
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 67 | 100 |
Reject | 48 | 281 |
n: 496
p < 0.0001
r: 0.22
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 192 | 38 |
Reject | 361 | 193 |
n: 784
p < 0.0001
r: 0.22
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 154 | 70 |
Reject | 141 | 181 |
n: 546
p < 0.0001
r: 0.22
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 181 | 21 |
Reject | 285 | 113 |
n: 600
p < 0.0001
r: 0.22
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 216 | 21 |
Reject | 438 | 131 |
n: 806
p < 0.0001
r: 0.21
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 187 | 92 |
Reject | 203 | 214 |
n: 696
p < 0.0001
r: -0.21
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 71 | 112 |
Reject | 254 | 174 |
n: 611
p < 0.0001
r: 0.21
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 52 | 139 |
Reject | 75 | 409 |
n: 675
p < 0.0001
r: 0.21
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 34 | 161 |
Reject | 40 | 519 |
n: 754
p < 0.0001
r: -0.21
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 51 | 76 |
Reject | 242 | 178 |
n: 547
p < 0.0001
r: 0.21
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 28 | 62 |
Reject | 33 | 253 |
n: 376
p < 0.0001
r: -0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 81 | 126 |
Reject | 304 | 200 |
n: 711
p < 0.0001
r: 0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 130 | 74 |
Reject | 202 | 268 |
n: 674
p < 0.0001
r: -0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 38 | 186 |
Reject | 91 | 231 |
n: 546
p < 0.0001
r: 0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 33 | 86 |
Reject | 53 | 335 |
n: 507
p < 0.0001
r: 0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 28 | 97 |
Reject | 27 | 306 |
n: 458
p < 0.0001
r: -0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 43 | 148 |
Reject | 196 | 321 |
n: 708
p < 0.0001
r: 0.2
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 151 | 40 |
Reject | 273 | 178 |
n: 642
p < 0.0001
r: 0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 55 | 118 |
Reject | 52 | 301 |
n: 526
p < 0.0001
r: -0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 50 | 125 |
Reject | 182 | 218 |
n: 575
p < 0.0001
r: 0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 6 | 7 |
Reject | 131 | 466 |
n: 610
p < 0.0001
r: 0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 85 | 108 |
Reject | 156 | 386 |
n: 735
p < 0.0001
r: -0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 11 | 191 |
Reject | 62 | 336 |
n: 600
p < 0.0001
r: 0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 201 | 27 |
Reject | 393 | 157 |
n: 778
p < 0.0001
r: 0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 227 | 75 |
Reject | 292 | 200 |
n: 794
p < 0.0001
r: 0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 42 | 64 |
Reject | 92 | 254 |
n: 452
p < 0.0001
r: -0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 7 | 144 |
Reject | 47 | 253 |
n: 451
p < 0.0001
r: -0.19
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 61 | 124 |
Reject | 205 | 223 |
n: 613
p < 0.0001
r: 0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 32 | 93 |
Reject | 55 | 360 |
n: 540
p < 0.0001
r: 0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 171 | 86 |
Reject | 199 | 217 |
n: 673
p < 0.0001
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 92 | 103 |
Reject | 363 | 197 |
n: 755
p < 0.0001
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 12 | 120 |
Reject | 95 | 300 |
n: 527
p < 0.0001
r: 0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 92 | 75 |
Reject | 176 | 273 |
n: 616
p < 0.0001
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 168 | 42 |
Reject | 521 | 66 |
n: 797
p < 0.0001
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 48 | 174 |
Reject | 193 | 318 |
n: 733
p < 0.0001
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 42 | 86 |
Reject | 145 | 124 |
n: 397
p: 0.0004
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 26 | 175 |
Reject | 111 | 318 |
n: 630
p < 0.0001
r: 0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 12 | 138 |
Reject | 16 | 436 |
n: 602
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 24 | 47 |
Reject | 108 | 134 |
n: 313
p: 0.0021
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 171 | 52 |
Reject | 284 | 247 |
n: 754
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 24 | 117 |
Reject | 26 | 326 |
n: 493
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 160 | 56 |
Reject | 335 | 247 |
n: 798
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 19 | 138 |
Reject | 118 | 335 |
n: 610
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 74 | 154 |
Reject | 102 | 456 |
n: 786
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 20 | 190 |
Reject | 31 | 557 |
n: 798
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 33 | 136 |
Reject | 175 | 320 |
n: 664
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 22 | 180 |
Reject | 116 | 349 |
n: 667
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 110 | 90 |
Reject | 176 | 305 |
n: 681
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 156 | 53 |
Reject | 417 | 69 |
n: 695
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 136 | 67 |
Reject | 456 | 118 |
n: 777
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 63 | 122 |
Reject | 93 | 335 |
n: 613
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 60 | 133 |
Reject | 73 | 376 |
n: 642
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 127 | 65 |
Reject | 257 | 262 |
n: 711
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 16 | 89 |
Reject | 29 | 323 |
n: 457
p: 0.0003
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 30 | 125 |
Reject | 61 | 419 |
n: 635
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 11 | 6 |
Reject | 604 | 141 |
n: 762
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 78 | 153 |
Reject | 167 | 204 |
n: 602
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 51 | 134 |
Reject | 69 | 359 |
n: 613
p < 0.0001
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 37 | 82 |
Reject | 180 | 209 |
n: 508
p: 0.0002
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 64 | 111 |
Reject | 268 | 232 |
n: 675
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 31 | 95 |
Reject | 39 | 294 |
n: 459
p: 0.0004
r: -0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 120 | 83 |
Reject | 431 | 151 |
n: 785
p < 0.0001
r: 0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 55 | 147 |
Reject | 88 | 426 |
n: 716
p < 0.0001
r: 0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 45 | 119 |
Reject | 75 | 351 |
n: 590
p < 0.0001
r: -0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 84 | 109 |
Reject | 264 | 222 |
n: 679
p < 0.0001
r: 0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 48 | 118 |
Reject | 82 | 299 |
n: 547
p < 0.0001
r: -0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 121 | 101 |
Reject | 395 | 175 |
n: 792
p < 0.0001
r: 0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Accept | Reject |
Accept | 71 | 106 |
Reject | 141 | 379 |
n: 697
p < 0.0001
Strongest correlations with demographic questions (target population)
r: -0.18
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 24 | 199 |
Reject | 184 | 418 |
n: 825
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 84 | 150 |
Reject | 125 | 465 |
n: 824
p < 0.0001
r: 0.17
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 46 | 134 |
Reject | 43 | 406 |
n: 629
p < 0.0001
r: -0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Yes | No |
Accept | 5 | 13 |
Reject | 233 | 564 |
n: 815
p < 0.0001
r: -0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 49 | 174 |
Reject | 193 | 409 |
n: 825
p < 0.0001
r: 0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 108 | 126 |
Reject | 135 | 455 |
n: 824
p < 0.0001
r: 0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 18 | 153 |
Reject | 10 | 447 |
n: 628
p < 0.0001
r: -0.16
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 10 | 224 |
Reject | 75 | 515 |
n: 824
p < 0.0001
r: 0.15
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 20 | 203 |
Reject | 14 | 588 |
n: 825
p < 0.0001
r: 0.15
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 14 | 166 |
Reject | 9 | 440 |
n: 629
p: 0.0002
r: -0.14
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 177 | 39 |
Reject | 544 | 50 |
n: 810
p < 0.0001
r: 0.14
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 45 | 178 |
Reject | 60 | 542 |
n: 825
p < 0.0001
r: 0.14
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 41 | 193 |
Reject | 50 | 540 |
n: 824
p < 0.0001
r: -0.14
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 12 | 211 |
Reject | 79 | 523 |
n: 825
p < 0.0001
r: 0.13
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 140 | 82 |
Reject | 276 | 284 |
n: 782
p: 0.0002
r: 0.13
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 14 | 166 |
Reject | 10 | 439 |
n: 629
p: 0.0007
r: -0.13
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 138 | 158 |
Reject | 280 | 208 |
n: 784
p: 0.0004
r: -0.12
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 21 | 150 |
Reject | 102 | 355 |
n: 628
p: 0.0018
r: 0.12
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 222 | 12 |
Reject | 498 | 77 |
n: 809
p: 0.0004
r: 0.12
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 17 | 154 |
Reject | 17 | 440 |
n: 628
p: 0.0021
r: -0.12
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 5 | 175 |
Reject | 30 | 419 |
n: 629
p: 0.0025
r: 0.12
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 15 | 201 |
Reject | 10 | 584 |
n: 810
p: 0.001
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 21 | 150 |
Reject | 27 | 430 |
n: 628
p: 0.0042
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 72 | 242 |
Reject | 77 | 435 |
n: 826
p: 0.0011
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 8 | 172 |
Reject | 7 | 442 |
n: 629
p: 0.005
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 10 | 213 |
Reject | 6 | 596 |
n: 825
p: 0.0014
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 119 | 104 |
Reject | 274 | 278 |
n: 775
p: 0.0022
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 11 | 160 |
Reject | 13 | 444 |
n: 628
p: 0.0061
r: -0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 148 | 85 |
Reject | 283 | 106 |
n: 622
p: 0.0066
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 143 | 41 |
Reject | 288 | 150 |
n: 622
p: 0.0071
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 157 | 81 |
Reject | 322 | 267 |
n: 827
p: 0.0022
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 15 | 156 |
Reject | 19 | 438 |
n: 628
p: 0.008
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Yes | No |
Accept | 7 | 11 |
Reject | 383 | 366 |
n: 767
p: 0.0034
r: 0.11
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 49 | 265 |
Reject | 38 | 474 |
n: 826
p: 0.0024
r: 0.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 7 | 173 |
Reject | 3 | 446 |
n: 629
p: 0.0086
r: -0.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 39 | 184 |
Reject | 151 | 451 |
n: 825
p: 0.0029
r: -0.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 24 | 214 |
Reject | 105 | 484 |
n: 827
p: 0.0037
r: -0.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 8 | 226 |
Reject | 56 | 519 |
n: 809
p: 0.0048
r: -0.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 33 | 189 |
Reject | 129 | 431 |
n: 782
p: 0.0067
r: 0.1
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 17 | 154 |
Reject | 19 | 438 |
n: 628
p: 0.0155
r: 0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 7 | 173 |
Reject | 7 | 442 |
n: 629
p: 0.0177
r: -0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 13 | 167 |
Reject | 63 | 386 |
n: 629
p: 0.0207
r: 0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 93 | 221 |
Reject | 99 | 413 |
n: 826
p: 0.0093
r: -0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 27 | 217 |
Reject | 62 | 324 |
n: 630
p: 0.0246
r: 0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 24 | 192 |
Reject | 40 | 554 |
n: 810
p: 0.0108
r: -0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Yes | No |
Accept | 12 | 6 |
Reject | 699 | 83 |
n: 800
p: 0.0127
r: 0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Yes | No |
Accept | 5 | 14 |
Reject | 132 | 654 |
n: 805
p: 0.0128
r: -0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 18 | 153 |
Reject | 70 | 387 |
n: 628
p: 0.0302
r: -0.09
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 28 | 195 |
Reject | 120 | 482 |
n: 825
p: 0.0144
r: 0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 46 | 173 |
Reject | 92 | 504 |
n: 815
p: 0.0157
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: infinitism | Yes | No |
Accept | 14 | 5 |
Reject | 651 | 135 |
n: 805
p: 0.0176
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 8 | 214 |
Reject | 41 | 519 |
n: 782
p: 0.02
r: 0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 35 | 198 |
Reject | 39 | 350 |
n: 622
p: 0.0385
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 7 | 173 |
Reject | 41 | 408 |
n: 629
p: 0.0386
r: 0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 14 | 166 |
Reject | 21 | 428 |
n: 629
p: 0.0401
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 5 | 229 |
Reject | 24 | 566 |
n: 824
p: 0.0202
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 171 | 143 |
Reject | 310 | 205 |
n: 829
p: 0.0207
r: 0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 58 | 186 |
Reject | 66 | 320 |
n: 630
p: 0.0444
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 8 | 163 |
Reject | 49 | 408 |
n: 628
p: 0.0483
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 13 | 171 |
Reject | 53 | 385 |
n: 622
p: 0.0499
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 173 | 46 |
Reject | 501 | 95 |
n: 815
p: 0.0284
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 7 | 231 |
Reject | 38 | 551 |
n: 827
p: 0.0281
r: -0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: nonreliabilist foundationalism | Yes | No |
Accept | 16 | 218 |
Reject | 89 | 501 |
n: 824
p: 0.0284
r: 0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 7 | 289 |
Reject | 5 | 483 |
n: 784
p: 0.0349
r: 0.08
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 53 | 170 |
Reject | 124 | 478 |
n: 825
p: 0.0312
r: 0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 44 | 270 |
Reject | 48 | 467 |
n: 829
p: 0.0328
r: 0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 35 | 188 |
Reject | 66 | 536 |
n: 825
p: 0.0345
r: -0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 39 | 275 |
Reject | 95 | 417 |
n: 826
p: 0.0397
r: 0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 10 | 213 |
Reject | 14 | 588 |
n: 825
p: 0.0406
r: 0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 12 | 211 |
Reject | 12 | 590 |
n: 825
p: 0.0406
r: -0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: coherentism | Yes | No |
Accept | 11 | 205 |
Reject | 59 | 509 |
n: 784
p: 0.0483
r: 0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 20 | 294 |
Reject | 20 | 492 |
n: 826
p: 0.0431
r: 0.07
| ||
---|---|---|
Justification: reliabilism | Yes | No |
Accept | 6 | 308 |
Reject | 3 | 512 |
n: 829
p: 0.0453